The timing is bad for this post, because the New York State government currently is not in session, but these thoughts were rattling around in my head and I had to get them out. If you watch or listen to the opponents of Mixed Martial Arts in New York, the biggest thing that they bring up in the violence, likening it to dog-fighting with men instead, or comparing it to gladiatorial slaughter. However, this is where the hypocrisy is, because they are not against these types of actions at all. A little over a year ago, it was ruled that according to the laws in this state, it is only PROFESSIONAL MMA that is illegal in New York. Amateur MMA is 100% completely legal, as well as 100% completely unregulated. The amount of hypocrisy is staggering. If they were against the violence at the professional level, which would be subject to rules, regulations, tests, safety precautions, etc., then it would stand to reason that they would want to close the loophole that allows unsanctioned, unregulated, amateur mixed martial arts matches to go on in this state as soon as possible. However, since the ruling came down legalizing amateur MMA, there hasn't been a single piece of legislation drawn up and introduced to close that Pandora's Box.
Yes, Mixed Martial Arts can be a dangerous way to earn a living. But it can be even more dangerous when it is performed without the safety precautions, advanced medical tests, regulations and standards that professional MMA is held to.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Bringing It Back
That's right. We're bringing it back. I understnd that it has been 2 whole years since I last posted, but I'm gonna be honest, things got a little complicated. I have changed addresses (twice), jobs (thrice), and overall, had to really lok at my life and dcide that I needed to start walking down a different path. This is the first step to that.
Moved into a new address out in Baldwinsville. It's nice, still settling in, haven't gotten everything moved in yet. But the key thing here, is that my computer is in a location that is more comfortable for me to use. I don't have a laptop currently, so the only way that I was going to be able to update was through my desktop, which for the last 2 years really ws in a spot that wasn't easy to access. That's changed with this new location, so you can expect to see a lot more from me in the future.
So, you will start to see a lot more of the random thoughts, the long, thought out posts, the ones that ramble, but really, actually, do have a point. Basically, a glimpse inside my brain and thoguht process, which, let's face it, no one has really been able to figure out yet. I'm bringing it back. Like the McRib...or the sexy. More like the sexy, because McRib is only a limited time thing.
Moved into a new address out in Baldwinsville. It's nice, still settling in, haven't gotten everything moved in yet. But the key thing here, is that my computer is in a location that is more comfortable for me to use. I don't have a laptop currently, so the only way that I was going to be able to update was through my desktop, which for the last 2 years really ws in a spot that wasn't easy to access. That's changed with this new location, so you can expect to see a lot more from me in the future.
So, you will start to see a lot more of the random thoughts, the long, thought out posts, the ones that ramble, but really, actually, do have a point. Basically, a glimpse inside my brain and thoguht process, which, let's face it, no one has really been able to figure out yet. I'm bringing it back. Like the McRib...or the sexy. More like the sexy, because McRib is only a limited time thing.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
In search of entertainment....
Has anyone else been watching a movie and have it all figured out in the first 20 minutes? It's annoying, isn't it? You sit there and watch the rest of the movie, hoping that maybe the actors will pull off some sort of transcendent performance to make you forget how uninspired the plot is, or maybe the writeers are able to at least punch it up with some witty dialogue. You just end up thinking, "Man, I could do better than this."
No. You can't.
It turns out that writing fiction can be incredibly difficult. I firmly believe that inside me, I have the next great movie franchise. but writing is hard. Dialogue is difficult to make it sound real and not forced, plot is difficult. Before you start, you need to have an idea as to what your story is about before you just sit down and start writing. But I'll tell ya, the part that I struggle with is coming up with names. Just simple names. First name, last name. How do you come up with something? Do you choose something ridiculous? Or something that sticks out? Or something plain?
Apparently, one of the hardest things to do is to simulate reality.
No. You can't.
It turns out that writing fiction can be incredibly difficult. I firmly believe that inside me, I have the next great movie franchise. but writing is hard. Dialogue is difficult to make it sound real and not forced, plot is difficult. Before you start, you need to have an idea as to what your story is about before you just sit down and start writing. But I'll tell ya, the part that I struggle with is coming up with names. Just simple names. First name, last name. How do you come up with something? Do you choose something ridiculous? Or something that sticks out? Or something plain?
Apparently, one of the hardest things to do is to simulate reality.
Friday, March 25, 2011
More psychobabble from the DVR
Last time I addressed the topic of my DVR, it was because I see parts of myself in the lead characters of House, Castle, and Chuck. A bunch of my DVR'ed shows are now on hiatus, but I think I can address them as well.
Last season, I got into Burn Notice, so lately, I have been going through the old seasons online so I can catch up. Michael Westen is a spy. Rather, he WAS a spy, when a spy gets fired, he receives a "Burn Notice" hence the title. Now, Michael Westen lives in Miami and he takes odd jobs helping people out of troubled situations while he hunts down and finds out who got him burned and why. Now, it does demonstrate that a majority of those in the espionage/intelligence trade possess what I would refer to as "situational ethics", but overall, the successful ones have a cause that they genuinely believe in and while the methods may include violence, overall, Michael Westen is a genuinely good person. My friends would say that they could see how this appeals to me in the fact that I am viewed to also have "situational ethics" but for the most part, am a good person.
White Collar is another show, also on the USA Network, that I got into and throoughly enjoy. It shows how two opposites can work very well together. Neal Caffrey is the smoothest of the smoothest, a forger, a con man, once more "situational ethics" and he raised his skills to a scary efficient levels and was living the good life until he was tracked down not once, but twice by hard-working, honest to a fault, Peter Burke. I'm not sure which one I feel I am more like, perhaps a combiination of the two leads.
Archer - Ohhhh myyy Archer. I love this show. Just completely wrong, inappropriate, uncontrollable humor from wannabe James Bonds. I am sooo proud to love this show, I think it says that I don't care sometimes about offending others, sometimes funny is just funny.
Yeah, so as we delve further into the mind of Bernie's DVR, I don't quite know what to think so far. But I like it.
Last season, I got into Burn Notice, so lately, I have been going through the old seasons online so I can catch up. Michael Westen is a spy. Rather, he WAS a spy, when a spy gets fired, he receives a "Burn Notice" hence the title. Now, Michael Westen lives in Miami and he takes odd jobs helping people out of troubled situations while he hunts down and finds out who got him burned and why. Now, it does demonstrate that a majority of those in the espionage/intelligence trade possess what I would refer to as "situational ethics", but overall, the successful ones have a cause that they genuinely believe in and while the methods may include violence, overall, Michael Westen is a genuinely good person. My friends would say that they could see how this appeals to me in the fact that I am viewed to also have "situational ethics" but for the most part, am a good person.
White Collar is another show, also on the USA Network, that I got into and throoughly enjoy. It shows how two opposites can work very well together. Neal Caffrey is the smoothest of the smoothest, a forger, a con man, once more "situational ethics" and he raised his skills to a scary efficient levels and was living the good life until he was tracked down not once, but twice by hard-working, honest to a fault, Peter Burke. I'm not sure which one I feel I am more like, perhaps a combiination of the two leads.
Archer - Ohhhh myyy Archer. I love this show. Just completely wrong, inappropriate, uncontrollable humor from wannabe James Bonds. I am sooo proud to love this show, I think it says that I don't care sometimes about offending others, sometimes funny is just funny.
Yeah, so as we delve further into the mind of Bernie's DVR, I don't quite know what to think so far. But I like it.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
How do we fix the economy? Cagefighting and Hookers for Everyone, 24-7!
People come up to me all the time and say "Bernie, times are tough. Man, how would YOU fix the economy?"
Now, people that know me know that I am a capitalist. I believe firmly in the ability to make as much money as possible doing what you can for as long as someone is willing to pay. However, capitalism, which is one of the greatest "isms" for running an economy, has an ugly downside. Capitalism is really only good during a healthy economy, in a bad economy, that whole make as much money as possible in the short term, only serves to create more of a problem. Part of this problem is caused by the human animal. You see, I feel that everything in the world can be boiled down to one of two motivations. The first is fear, the seocnd is greed. Now, greed is NOT a bad thing. Greed is what causes things to be improved upon, in fact, greed is the basis of the capitalist system. However, it is another law of nature at play here. Too much of ANYTHING is a bad thing. Too much greed in a weakend economy fails to take the consumer into mind. As opposed to making 90 cents for the rest of the lifetime of a customer, businesses following a strict capitalism philosophy will maximize profit in the short term. Well, when the economy is bad, eventually, the people who have been spoiled by your product will eventually make the hard choices necessary and stop buying your product. However, in the meantime, you will continue to maximize profit by raising your prices and raising your prices. Of course, you will blame this publicly on rising operating costs, but the rising operating costs are also caused by the fact that everyone else is following the same maximize your profit capitalist playbook. Everyone needs to post record profits, because if you don't post record profits, you don't get investors. However, as costs go up, and the economy tanks, one of the first things that people stop doing is...investing! SO...it's chasing money in the short run that helps cause this problem. before we start nodding our heads and saying "yeah, Bernie, you're right! this is all big busines's fault", (well, actually, the nodding and the first 5 words are fine), let's remember the greed of investors, you see, remember back a few sentences ago when I said that businesses need to charge higher prices to post higher profits? Do you remember why I said they needed that? Investors, that's right. You see, investors want returns IMMEDIATELY. Now, if it weren't for the investors demand for amazing returns immediately, this wouldn't happen. SO in reality, this is all everyone's fault. We all have a little hand in this.
Ok, so basically one way to fix the economy is to tell businesses to stop looking for the short term dollar and work for the long term. That really isn't going to happen off the bat, so what else can we do? The first suggestion came to me as I was ddriving around after a late night movie and realizing that there were all sorts of errands that I would like to run but couldn't because places were closed. Then I started thinking about all the people that were out of work and collecting unemployment and public assistance in one way or another and it hit me! You hear all the time that it is a smaller world, that the internet has created a business world without borders, however, the internet hasn't caused the death or the brick and mortar location. Part of what I would like to see is all that money the government doled out to banks for that bailout because of their own corporate and individual greed be used to stay open longer. Longer hours and weekend hours for banks would make things more convenient for their customers. It would also lead to more jobs for people. But why stop at just banks? Right now, generally at 4 am, your retail locations are fairly limited, some Walmarts, grocery stores, diners and Denny's. What about Lowe's? Home Depot? What if I wanted to do some home improvement at 4 am? I understand, keeping those businesses open that late would reduce profit. In fact, you would probably lose money by staying open 24 hours, well, more than likely, you wouldn't lose money, you would lose PROFIT, but you see, the way to improve an economy is by getting people to spend money. The only way more money can be spent is if more money is being paid out. The creation of these jobs has a bonus effect of creating other jobs. It would lower the amount of people eligible and receiving the unemployment and public assistance rolls. The people that would be working nights would need people watching their children at night while they went to work, creating even more jobs. I understand a fully 24 hour economy would have an effect on the small business owner, which is why I would make legislation limited to businesses of a certain size. Obviously, this is an idea that came to me at 4:15 am and would need some more research and this wouldn't be a popular idea and would require legislators to not listen to the lobbyists.
My next two ideas are strictly on a state level. It is currently illegal in NYS to have professional AND amateur Mixed Martial Arts competitions. Now, it's odd. As long as you have the martial arts separately, say, straight judo, karate, muay thai, or boxing events, those are completely legal. They are subject to regulation, organizations have to register with the state, file and pay for licenses, and have governing bodies. Yet, if you combine the sports together, it is now illegal. I have listened to the state congressional arguments about this sport, and the speeches are completely set up to appeal to the older voters, with quotes calling it "barbaric" and likening it to the Roman gladiators fighting to the death. Now, I don't fault these people for that, their jobs are dependent upon their voters. Anyone that wants to look at the safety record of MMA fighters when compared to every other "major league" sport in the country would probably be shocked at the injury lists and find that MMA fighting is safer than any other sport and when compared to it's closest competitor,boxing, would find that boxing is one of the most dangerous professions a person could enter into. Last Tuesday, the UFC sold 55,000 tickets in 15 minutes, the ticket tax alone for Toronto was 1.5 million dollars. Imagine what that could do in MSG in NYC? The legalization of MMA would also lead to more jobs being created, more money for the state. Organizations would have to be created professionally, paperwork and business titles would be filed and paid for, organizations, licenses have to be issued and PAID for. If an single UFC event can put a minimum of 1.5 million into the state coffers, what happens when smaller organizations pop up in the state and allow for more locally produced television events, ticket sales, advertising revenue, all of which the state can get a it's little finger dipped in.
Now the last idea is mostly going to be argued against by two of the most diametrically opposed parties: the Roman Catholic Church and organized crime. Someone tell me who the victim is in prostitution? Prostitution has always been illegal based strictly on a morality level. However, making it illegal has NEVER made it go away. There is a reason it is referred to as the "world's oldest profession." However, whores don't pay taxes. Pimps don't pay taxes. It's argued that if prostitution is legalized, than you will see the marketplace flooded with new whores, however I don't see these that occurring. But right now, there is forced prostitution, drug addicts, pimps that force their charges to work long hours with no regulation. If it was legalized, prostitutes would be forced to have mandatory drug tests, work regular hours, and be subject to all the safety regulations that any other job would have. PLUS another layer of government to oversee it, more jobs, stop tying up our police in unnecessary and expensive prostitution stings and lessen the load on our courts.Establish minimum quality standards, all sorts of benefits with this.
So...to wrap up, the next time you get out of a now legal MMA fight at 2 am, stop and pick up some spackle or just stop and blow off some steam at your local corner brothel. Remember, you're doing this for your country. BJJ and BJ's for everyone!
Now, people that know me know that I am a capitalist. I believe firmly in the ability to make as much money as possible doing what you can for as long as someone is willing to pay. However, capitalism, which is one of the greatest "isms" for running an economy, has an ugly downside. Capitalism is really only good during a healthy economy, in a bad economy, that whole make as much money as possible in the short term, only serves to create more of a problem. Part of this problem is caused by the human animal. You see, I feel that everything in the world can be boiled down to one of two motivations. The first is fear, the seocnd is greed. Now, greed is NOT a bad thing. Greed is what causes things to be improved upon, in fact, greed is the basis of the capitalist system. However, it is another law of nature at play here. Too much of ANYTHING is a bad thing. Too much greed in a weakend economy fails to take the consumer into mind. As opposed to making 90 cents for the rest of the lifetime of a customer, businesses following a strict capitalism philosophy will maximize profit in the short term. Well, when the economy is bad, eventually, the people who have been spoiled by your product will eventually make the hard choices necessary and stop buying your product. However, in the meantime, you will continue to maximize profit by raising your prices and raising your prices. Of course, you will blame this publicly on rising operating costs, but the rising operating costs are also caused by the fact that everyone else is following the same maximize your profit capitalist playbook. Everyone needs to post record profits, because if you don't post record profits, you don't get investors. However, as costs go up, and the economy tanks, one of the first things that people stop doing is...investing! SO...it's chasing money in the short run that helps cause this problem. before we start nodding our heads and saying "yeah, Bernie, you're right! this is all big busines's fault", (well, actually, the nodding and the first 5 words are fine), let's remember the greed of investors, you see, remember back a few sentences ago when I said that businesses need to charge higher prices to post higher profits? Do you remember why I said they needed that? Investors, that's right. You see, investors want returns IMMEDIATELY. Now, if it weren't for the investors demand for amazing returns immediately, this wouldn't happen. SO in reality, this is all everyone's fault. We all have a little hand in this.
Ok, so basically one way to fix the economy is to tell businesses to stop looking for the short term dollar and work for the long term. That really isn't going to happen off the bat, so what else can we do? The first suggestion came to me as I was ddriving around after a late night movie and realizing that there were all sorts of errands that I would like to run but couldn't because places were closed. Then I started thinking about all the people that were out of work and collecting unemployment and public assistance in one way or another and it hit me! You hear all the time that it is a smaller world, that the internet has created a business world without borders, however, the internet hasn't caused the death or the brick and mortar location. Part of what I would like to see is all that money the government doled out to banks for that bailout because of their own corporate and individual greed be used to stay open longer. Longer hours and weekend hours for banks would make things more convenient for their customers. It would also lead to more jobs for people. But why stop at just banks? Right now, generally at 4 am, your retail locations are fairly limited, some Walmarts, grocery stores, diners and Denny's. What about Lowe's? Home Depot? What if I wanted to do some home improvement at 4 am? I understand, keeping those businesses open that late would reduce profit. In fact, you would probably lose money by staying open 24 hours, well, more than likely, you wouldn't lose money, you would lose PROFIT, but you see, the way to improve an economy is by getting people to spend money. The only way more money can be spent is if more money is being paid out. The creation of these jobs has a bonus effect of creating other jobs. It would lower the amount of people eligible and receiving the unemployment and public assistance rolls. The people that would be working nights would need people watching their children at night while they went to work, creating even more jobs. I understand a fully 24 hour economy would have an effect on the small business owner, which is why I would make legislation limited to businesses of a certain size. Obviously, this is an idea that came to me at 4:15 am and would need some more research and this wouldn't be a popular idea and would require legislators to not listen to the lobbyists.
My next two ideas are strictly on a state level. It is currently illegal in NYS to have professional AND amateur Mixed Martial Arts competitions. Now, it's odd. As long as you have the martial arts separately, say, straight judo, karate, muay thai, or boxing events, those are completely legal. They are subject to regulation, organizations have to register with the state, file and pay for licenses, and have governing bodies. Yet, if you combine the sports together, it is now illegal. I have listened to the state congressional arguments about this sport, and the speeches are completely set up to appeal to the older voters, with quotes calling it "barbaric" and likening it to the Roman gladiators fighting to the death. Now, I don't fault these people for that, their jobs are dependent upon their voters. Anyone that wants to look at the safety record of MMA fighters when compared to every other "major league" sport in the country would probably be shocked at the injury lists and find that MMA fighting is safer than any other sport and when compared to it's closest competitor,boxing, would find that boxing is one of the most dangerous professions a person could enter into. Last Tuesday, the UFC sold 55,000 tickets in 15 minutes, the ticket tax alone for Toronto was 1.5 million dollars. Imagine what that could do in MSG in NYC? The legalization of MMA would also lead to more jobs being created, more money for the state. Organizations would have to be created professionally, paperwork and business titles would be filed and paid for, organizations, licenses have to be issued and PAID for. If an single UFC event can put a minimum of 1.5 million into the state coffers, what happens when smaller organizations pop up in the state and allow for more locally produced television events, ticket sales, advertising revenue, all of which the state can get a it's little finger dipped in.
Now the last idea is mostly going to be argued against by two of the most diametrically opposed parties: the Roman Catholic Church and organized crime. Someone tell me who the victim is in prostitution? Prostitution has always been illegal based strictly on a morality level. However, making it illegal has NEVER made it go away. There is a reason it is referred to as the "world's oldest profession." However, whores don't pay taxes. Pimps don't pay taxes. It's argued that if prostitution is legalized, than you will see the marketplace flooded with new whores, however I don't see these that occurring. But right now, there is forced prostitution, drug addicts, pimps that force their charges to work long hours with no regulation. If it was legalized, prostitutes would be forced to have mandatory drug tests, work regular hours, and be subject to all the safety regulations that any other job would have. PLUS another layer of government to oversee it, more jobs, stop tying up our police in unnecessary and expensive prostitution stings and lessen the load on our courts.Establish minimum quality standards, all sorts of benefits with this.
So...to wrap up, the next time you get out of a now legal MMA fight at 2 am, stop and pick up some spackle or just stop and blow off some steam at your local corner brothel. Remember, you're doing this for your country. BJJ and BJ's for everyone!
Friday, March 11, 2011
Too much of a minty fresh thing...
I don't know how many of you have ever sat down and tried to be creative on demand, but it can be difficult. Often, I have to look for inspiration from friends and take an idea and flesh it out into a full blown post. This is one such post.
Let's start with a story. A friend of mine, let's give her a name, for the sake of anonymity we will call her Poison Hivey. So, Poison Hivey is out shopping, checking things off her list as she wanders through the wonderful land of Tar-zhay. Tar-hzay is a wondrous world, filled with everything anyone could possibly want, and the patrons and supporters of Tar-zhay would claim that it is of a higher quality than it's rival city-state WallyWorld. Our heroine, Poison Hivey, has come to the last item on her list. Mouthwash. She stands at the end of the aisle and she is in awe! What a wonderful place, this Tar-zhay. As far as the eye can see, an entire aisle of nothing but mouthwash. As she wanders through the seemingly interminable aisle, seeing variety after variety of mouthwash, our heroine starts thinking to herself, this is wonder ful, this is amazing, this...is...insane!! How can there be this much mouthwash and how much of this is truly necessary?? As she gets more and more worked up thinking about this it slowly dawns upon her that in this entire AISLE of mouthwash, the one thing that they don't have is...THE TYPE THAT SHE WANTS! Well, Poison Hivey has had just about enough of this nonsense. She unleashes her powers of biting sarcasm and muffled swearing under her breath and checks out, paying for her other items and returning home, breath not minty-fresh, refusing to purchase any of the false mouthwashes that ARE available to her.
Now, poor Poison Hivey is without the product that she prefers, but brings this to my attention. In this day and age, rather than settle for a product that she deems inferior to her preferred tastes, she would go without. There are starving children in Zambia with HORRIBLE breath that would gladly grab the lowest grade product off of that shelf and be completely ecstatic about it. It kind of sends a strange message about the type of consumer-driven world that we live in. When we shop, are we really buying a product for the purpose it serves or the message that the packaging sends? Is this all a matter of taste? Of preference? Are there too many options for us? Why is it acceptable to have lower quality products at all? I have had this same thought when walking in a drug store and noticing products for, well, let's just say primarily a female based product for subjects of a more "yeasty" nature. There is a Monistat-7, which clears up the infection in a week, there is also a Monistat-3, aptly named for it's ability to resolve the issue in 3 days. There is also a Monistat-1...I think you see where this is headed. Now tell me, why is it acceptable to continue to offer the 3 and the 7 when there IS a 1 available?? A matter of personal preference and profit margin I suppose, but really? Can't we get together for the greater good and and in such instances decide that the ideal solution is the 1 day option?
Well, that went somewhere dark (and warm) in a hurry, back to Poison Hivey and her mouthwash (or lack of it.) Not being able to find the product she prefers, she would rather go without. This shows an extreme example of brand awareness and brand identification. Coke and Pepsi have had this fight for YEARS. There are those that buy only Coke products and will forgo Pepsi products, despite the fact that there really is very little difference in the products. Yes, I know, it tastes different and you can definitely tell the difference, but still, it's a soft drink, people. If you were dying of thirst, would you pass up the bargain brand and go without? Somehow, I doubt it. But sometimes more isn't always better, sometimes more is just...more. And it can be overwhelming. I have fallen victim to this myself. Countless times I have found myself slack-jawed at an ice cream stand, overwhelmed by the flavors and options. Too many options has a paralyzing effect on me. Obviously, any option I choose I will enjoy, but I am terrified that I might be missing out on one that I will enjoy just a bit better.
Have we become a nation of sheep? Are we all too easily influenced by the slick marketing and the promises of a better customer experience that we just buy whatever our corporate overlords demand of us? Or are we simply able to reap the advantages of living in a time and place where an entire aisle of mouthwash is available to us and we don't have to compromise our desires for something that isn't quite up to snuff. Food for thought...or mouthwash. Discuss amongst yourself...except with Poison Hivey..she doesn't have minty fresh breath.
Let's start with a story. A friend of mine, let's give her a name, for the sake of anonymity we will call her Poison Hivey. So, Poison Hivey is out shopping, checking things off her list as she wanders through the wonderful land of Tar-zhay. Tar-hzay is a wondrous world, filled with everything anyone could possibly want, and the patrons and supporters of Tar-zhay would claim that it is of a higher quality than it's rival city-state WallyWorld. Our heroine, Poison Hivey, has come to the last item on her list. Mouthwash. She stands at the end of the aisle and she is in awe! What a wonderful place, this Tar-zhay. As far as the eye can see, an entire aisle of nothing but mouthwash. As she wanders through the seemingly interminable aisle, seeing variety after variety of mouthwash, our heroine starts thinking to herself, this is wonder ful, this is amazing, this...is...insane!! How can there be this much mouthwash and how much of this is truly necessary?? As she gets more and more worked up thinking about this it slowly dawns upon her that in this entire AISLE of mouthwash, the one thing that they don't have is...THE TYPE THAT SHE WANTS! Well, Poison Hivey has had just about enough of this nonsense. She unleashes her powers of biting sarcasm and muffled swearing under her breath and checks out, paying for her other items and returning home, breath not minty-fresh, refusing to purchase any of the false mouthwashes that ARE available to her.
Now, poor Poison Hivey is without the product that she prefers, but brings this to my attention. In this day and age, rather than settle for a product that she deems inferior to her preferred tastes, she would go without. There are starving children in Zambia with HORRIBLE breath that would gladly grab the lowest grade product off of that shelf and be completely ecstatic about it. It kind of sends a strange message about the type of consumer-driven world that we live in. When we shop, are we really buying a product for the purpose it serves or the message that the packaging sends? Is this all a matter of taste? Of preference? Are there too many options for us? Why is it acceptable to have lower quality products at all? I have had this same thought when walking in a drug store and noticing products for, well, let's just say primarily a female based product for subjects of a more "yeasty" nature. There is a Monistat-7, which clears up the infection in a week, there is also a Monistat-3, aptly named for it's ability to resolve the issue in 3 days. There is also a Monistat-1...I think you see where this is headed. Now tell me, why is it acceptable to continue to offer the 3 and the 7 when there IS a 1 available?? A matter of personal preference and profit margin I suppose, but really? Can't we get together for the greater good and and in such instances decide that the ideal solution is the 1 day option?
Well, that went somewhere dark (and warm) in a hurry, back to Poison Hivey and her mouthwash (or lack of it.) Not being able to find the product she prefers, she would rather go without. This shows an extreme example of brand awareness and brand identification. Coke and Pepsi have had this fight for YEARS. There are those that buy only Coke products and will forgo Pepsi products, despite the fact that there really is very little difference in the products. Yes, I know, it tastes different and you can definitely tell the difference, but still, it's a soft drink, people. If you were dying of thirst, would you pass up the bargain brand and go without? Somehow, I doubt it. But sometimes more isn't always better, sometimes more is just...more. And it can be overwhelming. I have fallen victim to this myself. Countless times I have found myself slack-jawed at an ice cream stand, overwhelmed by the flavors and options. Too many options has a paralyzing effect on me. Obviously, any option I choose I will enjoy, but I am terrified that I might be missing out on one that I will enjoy just a bit better.
Have we become a nation of sheep? Are we all too easily influenced by the slick marketing and the promises of a better customer experience that we just buy whatever our corporate overlords demand of us? Or are we simply able to reap the advantages of living in a time and place where an entire aisle of mouthwash is available to us and we don't have to compromise our desires for something that isn't quite up to snuff. Food for thought...or mouthwash. Discuss amongst yourself...except with Poison Hivey..she doesn't have minty fresh breath.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
A nice place to visit...but I wouldn't want to live there....Or would I?
I have a dirty secret. Lean in close and promise not to let it out and I will spill the beans and let you in on it.
I love Syracuse, NY.
I know. It's horrible...and for most people I know, it's unheard of and unthinkable. They would all rather be somewhere else. My friend's that grew up here and moved to warmer climates post passive-aggressive status messages on facebook, designed to elicit bitter responses about how much they are enjoying the weather where they live.
But I do love where I live. It isn't perfect, but nowhere is. Yes, we get a lot of snow. It's winter. It is supposed to snow. Last I checked, winter is also supposed to be cold. So we have no issue there. I love the beautiful fall foliage, the explosion of colors as you watch the leaves change. The perfect crispness of the air in the fall, that time of year when you go outside and you can SMELL someone starting a fire. Absolutely perfect.
But, as much as I love my home city, it only natural to think about how it would be to live somewhere else. I have been lucky enough to do some traveling, being in some places for only a few hours, some for days, and there are some places that I would like to visit and possibly live there.
1. San Francisco. Absolutely gorgeous city. Completely different type of city, beautiful architecture, beautiful, cool climate. Not a big fan of earthquakes, and I think I would miss the snow, but as a whole, truly my number one.
2. London, England. I know, crazy, right? But after spending almost a week in London, I totally would want to go back. I can't imagine that a lot of people would consider a trade of the weather in Syracuse for the weather in London to be anything but an even trade, but remember, I am one of the few that isn't bothered that much by the weather. I truly loved everything about London.
3. Pittsburgh, PA. I only spent a few hours in Pittsburgh, but the time that I spent there, I truly enjoyed. I really got that blue-collar feel and none of the pretension that many larger cities do carry with them. The sporting stadiums are some of the most beautiful in all of sports and do the city proud.
4. Chicago, IL. Another beautiful and distinctly unique city. Once more, some extremely harsh winters, but Grant Park and Soldier Field in the summer and fall, along with some incredible steakhouses and other food would make it completely worth it.
Now, there are many other places that I would love to visit and see for myself. And maybe one of them could take a spot on my list and maybe even persuade me to move there and live there. I've always wanted to go to the Pacific Northwest, maybe take 2 weeks and spend it driving from Portland to Seattle to Vancouver, where I've heard it rains quite a bit, but it is completely lush and beautiful and the food scene is to die for. There are a few notable places that didn't quite make my list of place I would want to live. Washington DC, a great vibrant city, but not a place I would ever want to live and the granddaddy of them all...the city so nice they named it twice, New York, NY. I have been to NYC numerous times and I have always felt the same way about it. I love going there. I love being a tourist there. I would never want to live there. In fact, I think the only place that ranks below NYC is Paris France, another beautiful city completely ruined by the French.
I love Syracuse, NY.
I know. It's horrible...and for most people I know, it's unheard of and unthinkable. They would all rather be somewhere else. My friend's that grew up here and moved to warmer climates post passive-aggressive status messages on facebook, designed to elicit bitter responses about how much they are enjoying the weather where they live.
But I do love where I live. It isn't perfect, but nowhere is. Yes, we get a lot of snow. It's winter. It is supposed to snow. Last I checked, winter is also supposed to be cold. So we have no issue there. I love the beautiful fall foliage, the explosion of colors as you watch the leaves change. The perfect crispness of the air in the fall, that time of year when you go outside and you can SMELL someone starting a fire. Absolutely perfect.
But, as much as I love my home city, it only natural to think about how it would be to live somewhere else. I have been lucky enough to do some traveling, being in some places for only a few hours, some for days, and there are some places that I would like to visit and possibly live there.
1. San Francisco. Absolutely gorgeous city. Completely different type of city, beautiful architecture, beautiful, cool climate. Not a big fan of earthquakes, and I think I would miss the snow, but as a whole, truly my number one.
2. London, England. I know, crazy, right? But after spending almost a week in London, I totally would want to go back. I can't imagine that a lot of people would consider a trade of the weather in Syracuse for the weather in London to be anything but an even trade, but remember, I am one of the few that isn't bothered that much by the weather. I truly loved everything about London.
3. Pittsburgh, PA. I only spent a few hours in Pittsburgh, but the time that I spent there, I truly enjoyed. I really got that blue-collar feel and none of the pretension that many larger cities do carry with them. The sporting stadiums are some of the most beautiful in all of sports and do the city proud.
4. Chicago, IL. Another beautiful and distinctly unique city. Once more, some extremely harsh winters, but Grant Park and Soldier Field in the summer and fall, along with some incredible steakhouses and other food would make it completely worth it.
Now, there are many other places that I would love to visit and see for myself. And maybe one of them could take a spot on my list and maybe even persuade me to move there and live there. I've always wanted to go to the Pacific Northwest, maybe take 2 weeks and spend it driving from Portland to Seattle to Vancouver, where I've heard it rains quite a bit, but it is completely lush and beautiful and the food scene is to die for. There are a few notable places that didn't quite make my list of place I would want to live. Washington DC, a great vibrant city, but not a place I would ever want to live and the granddaddy of them all...the city so nice they named it twice, New York, NY. I have been to NYC numerous times and I have always felt the same way about it. I love going there. I love being a tourist there. I would never want to live there. In fact, I think the only place that ranks below NYC is Paris France, another beautiful city completely ruined by the French.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)